ESTCP projects were sought that resulted in innovative tools, attractants, methodologies, or technologies that improved the efficiency of Brown Tree Snake (Boiga irregularis) (BTS) trapping and removal on the island of Guam and similar locations. Specifically, ESTCP was interested the following:
- Devices optimized for high BTS density scenario where the goal is to rapidly reduce the numbers of snakes in an area. Designers may assume that the devices will be serviced by personnel on a regular basis with the result that live lures may be maintained and the removal of live snakes feasible.
- Devices optimized for low BTS density scenario where snakes have been consistently removed and are known to be at low densities, where incipient snake populations are suspected, or where risk of accidental snake arrival is high. In the low density scenario, “sentinel devices” that require low maintenance but result in the capture or death of any snake encountering the device is optimal. In the low density scenario, must not need to be frequently visited; as a result, live lures or live snake capture may not be suitable.
- Operational analysis of the current Brown Tree Snake methods used on DoD installations on Guam. Performers are encouraged to propose a systematic examination of current BTS control tactics by mathematical and statistical methods to determine their efficiency and to devise or indicate possible improvements.
Proposals could have addressed one or more or the above interests. Proposals that attempted to address all of the above listed interests, risked appearing unfocused.
With regard to devices, proposals for systems that removed snakes that were not actively foraging or were in prey-rich environments received strong consideration. Lethal or nonlethal methods for BTS removal were allowed to be proposed. Lethal removal devices, or ‘kill traps’ should have been designed to achieve a quick, reliable, and relatively humane death. All efforts should have complied with the Animal Welfare Act. Dead bait systems currently in use were well understood and optimized for simplicity, so their modification wes not being sought in this call for proposals. Proposed systems should have minimized nontarget by-catch such as coconut crabs (Birgus latro) and rats (Rattus spp.) to the extent possible. Devices should have been demonstrated in a field environment and evaluated by qualified BTS research or management agencies using, at a minimum, the trap evaluation criteria outlined by Engeman and Vice (2000)1 modified to include attractions, captures, and escapes per unit effort (e.g., trap night), size distribution, cost, practicality, humaneness, and information content. Proposals related to device development should have proposed criteria to test system efficacy and validated population impacts.
Proposers should have demonstrated an understanding of the biology and behavior of BTS, the objectives of BTS control, and an awareness of the control tools currently in use. Proposals should have explicitly described the proposed device and explained the concept of operation of the proposed device within the current control framework.
11 Engeman, R. M., and D. S. Vice. 2000. Standardizing the evaluation of brown tree snake trap designs. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 5:205-212.
Funded projects will appear below as project overviews are posted to the website.