skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .mil
A .mil website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization.

Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Fed Outside of DoD _ DoD Universities & Private Sector
serdp and estcp logo
  • About Us
  • Projects
    Project Directory Energy & Water Test & Training Lands Chemicals & Materials Natural Hazards PFAS Other Chemicals of Concern UXO
  • News
  • Webinars
  • Resources
  • Work With Us
  • Mailing List Login to SEMS
Mailing List Login to SEMS

For mobile, landscape view is recommended.

Coastal Resilience in Arctic and Sub-Arctic Regions

ESTCP, Natural Hazards Adaptation Program Area

Released February 25, 2026

Due Date April 24, 2026


FY 2026
  1. Work With Us
  2. ESTCP FY 2026 Solicitation - Natural Hazards Adaptation Technologies

Objective

The Natural Hazards Adaptation program area is seeking innovative demonstration and validation efforts that will advance the state of the science to protect critical infrastructure on the coasts of Alaska. The goal is to advance Arctic resilience, improve predictive model capabilities, and increase infrastructure and military readiness as permafrost thaw, uncertain sea ice and snow distributions, coastal erosion, coastal flooding, and storm surge threaten Department of War (DoW) assets and operational readiness. Submitted proposals should outline a plan to develop scalable methods, tools, or systems to address, monitor, model, or forecast coastal hazards in Alaska. 

This solicitation will leverage efforts associated with the Alaska Innovation Landscape Network (AILN) to ensure interoperability and scaling of products that rapidly address emerging needs of the DoW end-user. AILN facilitates co-production, the collaborative process of researcher and end-user producing and refining science and technology products together. This process is key to translating successful technology into operations that  support installation managers and mission sustainment objectives across DoW’s 27 million acres and of particular value in Alaska.  Proposers must consider the following in the development of their proposal:

  • Reference either the current development state of the project technology (current projects) OR the state of the project technology at project completion (past projects) and the additional investment needed to transfer from the prototype phase to operational demonstrations.
  • Describe the novel application of the data/tool/technology and the justification for DoW investment (return on investment, increased efficacy or accuracy, etc.).
  • Demonstrate the applicability in the Arctic or sub-Arctic region.
  • Demonstrate connection to and awareness of the end-user community’s (e.g., installation-level natural resource managers) needs and application for proposed technology. Clearly identify partners in each end-user community for co-leading demonstration and evaluation, or a plan for engaging with the end-user community throughout the project as appropriate.
  • Proposals which leverage and integrate existing data and data systems will be a priority. Proposals that leverage Earth observation data and sensors are a priority, including spaceborne and airborne remote sensing data (from NASA and other sources). Use of UAV-acquired data to validate spaceborne data to enable modeling and transferability of science to remote and larger regions is encouraged.
  • If the proposal is based on a current or completed DoW or other Federally-funded program, including SERDP or ESTCP, project numbers should be referenced in the proposal, and demonstrations should be put in the context of all previously funded investments.

Proposals should also consider the following information for specific sections of the proposal:

  • In the Technical Approach section, provide a detailed description of the technical approach, including the availability of data to evaluate tool, strategy, or technology performance. Proposers should clearly state expected deliverables and provide sufficient detail so that the technical approach can be clearly understood by reviewers. Proposals must indicate the technology readiness level (TRL) of their proposed effort at project initiation and expected TRL at project completion.
  • In the Expected Benefits section, a qualitative and semi-quantitative description of the expected benefit to DoW and broader impacts of a successful project should be included.
  • The Technology Transition section should discuss activities, including the key elements of science and technology translation that will be followed, needed to engage with key stakeholders and translate this technology into operations. This section should be detailed, accounting for the inherent need to communicate to, translate to, and gather information from the end-user community of installation planners, engineers, and natural resource managers.
  • Projects should execute rapid test and evaluation plans in an 18 month time frame.

Expected Benefits

Funded efforts will improve operational readiness by enhancing the resilience of Arctic infrastructure to coastal hazards. Advancement of scientific understanding and operational tools around Arctic coastal hazards to infrastructure, and also to operations, is critical to sustaining mission and DoW readiness in the Arctic, a geopolitically significant region.

Background

Coastal Alaska is experiencing accelerated erosion; along the Alaskan North Slope, average shoreline retreat rates have been measured at roughly –2.0 m per year regionally, and localized rates up to –19 m per year (USGS). Retreat rates up to ~20 m/year have even been documented at specific sites (e.g., Drew Point, AK). The combination of thawing ice-rich cliffs and reduced protective sea ice means that erosion now poses a sustained and growing threat to infrastructure, subsistence terrain, and community viability.

Typhoon remnants and extra-tropical cyclones are increasingly reaching Alaska’s western and southern coasts, producing high winds, storm surges, and flooding in remote villages. In October 2025, the remnants of Typhoon Halong struck the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta region of western Alaska. A storm surge of over 6 feet (~1.8 m) above normal tide levels was reported, which swept homes off their foundations and displaced communities. These regions are only accessible by air or boat, making evacuation and relief operations complex, slow, and costly. 

Uncertainty in near shore sea ice extent and stability, snow distributions on land, stability and persistence of over ice transport, and trafficability hazards associated with soil moisture and permafrost thaw all impact operational readiness and emergency response in coastal regions. 

DoW assets in remote operating locations of the Arctic face two complementary yet distinct hazard pathways — slow-creep land loss from erosion and permafrost thaw and rapid onset damage from flooding, storm surge, and typhoon events. The uniquely limited access to many of the areas affected by these phenomena adds a layer of logistical complexity and cost that must be addressed to sustain DoW mission.

Proposal and Solicitation Specifics

Submissions should be full proposals only (no pre-proposal stage), with a maximum of 10 pages. No selection briefings will be required from Principal Investigators. Projects should execute rapid test and evaluation plans with period of performance not to exceed 18-month time frame.

serdp and estcp logo
 

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP)

Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP)

 
 
  • Project Directory
  • Energy & Water Test & Training Lands Chemicals & Materials Natural Hazards PFAS Other Chemicals of Concern UXO
  • NEWS
  • WEBINARS
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT US
  • Login to SEMS
  • Mailing List
 

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Energy Resilience & Optimization) 
3500 Defense Pentagon, RM 5C646
Washington, DC 20301-3500

Phone (571) 372-6565

Contact | Accessibility | FOIA Requests | Privacy Policy | Copyright Information | Media/Press

About DoD | DoD Information Quality | No Fear Act | Plain Language | Privacy Program | USA.gov

 
  • Project Directory
  • Energy & Water Test & Training Lands Chemicals & Materials Natural Hazards PFAS Other Chemicals of Concern UXO
  • NEWS
  • WEBINARS
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT US
Login to SEMS
Mailing List
 

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Energy Resilience & Optimization) 
3500 Defense Pentagon, RM 5C646
Washington, DC 20301-3500

Phone (571) 372-6565

Contact | Accessibility | FOIA Requests | Privacy Policy | Copyright Information | Media/Press

About DoD | DoD Information Quality | No Fear Act | Plain Language | Privacy Program | USA.gov