AP, RDX, and TNT are ubiquitous within the DoD. AP, TNT and RDX have been identified as environmental risks due to mobility in groundwater from contaminated surfaces. TNT also presents an occupational health hazard due to dermal and inhalation issues. Program Managers, installations and, most importantly, Warfighters across all services would benefit from sustainable, next generation explosive and propulsion formulations that do not require AP, RDX, or TNT. Elimination of AP, RDX, and TNT will reduce environmental issues throughout the lifecycle, from manufacture of the material to demilitarization operations.
Propulsion. There are currently no known viable alternatives for AP as the main oxidizer in solid rocket propellants. Although alternative oxidizers exist that do not contain perchlorates, the alternatives suffer from cost, availability, stability, and performance issues that prevent them from being viable alternatives. In order to identify a viable replacement, individual tactical missile systems requirements must be considered due to the wide range of performance requirements of the entire U.S. tactical missile arsenal.
Composition B. Composition B is a melt-castable high explosive formulation composed of RDX and TNT. Research and development efforts to produce RDX and TNT alternatives have resulted in limited transitioned products to the industrial base. Most alternatives suffer from environmental, cost, availability, stability, and performance issues which prevent them from being viable alternatives.